Annals of Diagnostic Pathology
Volume 14, Issue 2 , Pages 74-80, April 2010

Renal pelvic urothelial carcinoma with divergent morphology

Department of Pathology, Box 1194, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, NY 10029, USA

published online 12 February 2010.

Abstract 

Compared with that of urinary bladder, urothelial carcinoma of renal pelvis is infrequent and its morphologic features and presentations have seldom been described. Fifty-nine renal pelvic urothelial carcinomas were evaluated in this study. Seventy-eight percent of these were high-grade tumors, of which 39% contained variable amount of divergent morphology. Forty-four percent of the high-grade urothelial carcinomas presented with an advanced tumor stage. Seventy-eight percent of urothelial carcinomas with divergent morphology displayed a tumor stage of pT2 and above, compared with 21% of classical urothelial carcinomas, which presented at stage pT2 and above. In summary, high-grade and unusual morphology as well as advanced tumor stage were the frequent findings in pelvicalyceal urothelial carcinomas. In addition, divergent morphology was correlated with advanced tumor stage. The clinicopathologic features of pelvicalyceal urothelial carcinomas with unusual divergent morphology were particularly emphasized in this study.

Keywords: Renal pelvis, Pelvicalyces, Urothelial carcinoma, Divergent morphology

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S1092-9134(09)00147-6

doi:10.1016/j.anndiagpath.2009.10.009

Annals of Diagnostic Pathology
Volume 14, Issue 2 , Pages 74-80, April 2010